🔗 Share this article

In today's Britain, public demonstration is no longer a basic freedom. Instead, it has become a conditional permission that those in power allow or withhold as they see fit. This represents the underlying meaning of proposed measures that the ruling administration is putting forward, which would determine when and where protests can take place, with possible imprisonment for those who disobey these restrictions.

Erosion of Democratic Rights

Previous governments had already undermined this essential right: the previous Tory administration had granted law enforcement extensive new authorities, which global rights bodies had condemned as "serious and undue restrictions" on democratic freedoms. Taken together, these progressive attacks on freedom have effectively abolished the historically earned right to public demonstration.

Exploiting Atrocity to Rationalize Crackdown

The most recent restrictive measures are being defended by citing last week's heinous antisemitic attack on a British mosque. We can all agree on universal agreement that the safety of Jewish communities in Britain must be safeguarded. However, employing this horrific incident as a justification to stifle opposition is not only unrelated to that responsibility but perverts it.

"If you can't set boundaries at mass killing, you likely cannot draw the line at democratic principles," commented a prominent American author, whose words that rings true for the present administration.

Historical Perspective of Demonstration

Consider Britain's rich history of public demonstration and direct action against racism and authoritarianism, from the 1936 Battle of Cable Street to postwar Jewish anti-fascist movements and the 1970s mobilizations against the far-right organization. Many of these early protesters were labeled as extremists in their era, even while they were fighting for the freedoms of minorities.

Current Reality

In today's complex situation, here's what's actually happening: Israel – a foreign state – is committing what United Nations investigations have described as systematic destruction. Its warfare have prompted the International Criminal Court to issue arrest warrants against Benjamin Netanyahu and his former defense minister.

International public opinion has changed significantly against Israel's military campaign. In Britain, a substantial majority of the public think Israel has probably committed international law violations. Most people would support a complete ban on weapons exports to the nation, and approve the arrest of the Israeli leader.

Suppressing Opposition

Having essentially failed the public debate, pro-Israel advocates are now seizing on a vile anti-Jewish attack to try to silence a mass movement against a moral catastrophe. The British government seems included in this attempt. Government officials have not enacted extensive restrictions on Israel and have permitted weapon shipments to proceed.

People who are protesting against the destruction of Gaza have been characterized as dangerous radicals. Yet there's a important factor why there hasn't been a broader suppression on these protesters until now: very limited protesters have made truly offensive statements about Jewish people, giving law enforcement little justification to intervene.

Problematic Association

Equating Jewish heritage with the actions of the government of Israel is not only cynical but also harmful. The official definition of antisemitism, adopted by the British government and numerous institutions, has been rightly questioned for potentially stifling legitimate criticism of Israel. However, there should be no disagreement about one of its central illustrations: that "holding Jewish people collectively responsible for decisions of the state of Israel" constitutes antisemitism.

Increasing Limitations

This is why we've arrived at a situation where law enforcement can propose that protests criticizing Israel's policies should be called off because they might "inadvertently or intentionally" endorse anti-Jewish sentiment. Similarly, political figures have declared that recognition of Palestinian statehood has made organizations "implicated" in alleged abuse faced by Jewish communities.

Inconsistent Treatment

On the same day as the religious center assault, the Israeli military killed dozens of Palestinians in Gaza – adding to the horrific toll from 24 months of ongoing violence that have taken tens of thousands of lives. British politicians and media outlets have barely concealed the limited value they assign to Palestinian life. This represents one of the boldest expressions of discrimination in our time.

Breaking Boundaries

Our government has already crossed a dangerous threshold by proscribing a specific activist group, a non-violent, human rights-focused activist collective. Thousands of British demonstrators have been arrested, primarily for holding placards opposing genocide and endorsing the banned organization. Many of those detained are elderly citizens; including a retired priest and the child of a Holocaust survivor.

Global Comparisons

It's easy to see where this trajectory leads. In the United States, government officials helped demonize demonstrations supporting Palestine: a former House Speaker suggested that some were "linked with" foreign governments, while the current president characterized such protests as anti-Jewish. In doing so, they contributed to normalizing the repressive measures on such demonstrations – and on free speech in general.

Looking Ahead

If a hard-right government comes to power, it would be given sweeping powers to control dissent. What might a Reform government do with this restrictive framework? Our ancestors fought, suffered and sacrificed their lives to establish our liberties. We may ultimately rue how casually we allowed them to be eroded.